We don't need quite so many `GetOk`s since the client library will ignore any fields that are set to the zero value for that type. I left a few that involved error-handling or things that had to be set before other things, but this at least should make the code a bit nicer to look at.
Tests are passing except the ones that were already failing in CI.
Google Apps is a former name.
Also, I mention primary domain and domain alias. It seems I have
to use the primary domain. Otherwise, GCP replaces the field to the primary one.
And every time Terraform plan returns a diff about it.
I used domain alias for `members` arg in `google_project_iam_member`
resource. `terraform apply` was succeeded. However, when I run modify
other resources, I got a diff about the `google_project_iam_member`
resource.
When reading or deleting the google_project_service resource, first
retrieve the project. If it's not found, or if it's pending deletion,
remove the service, as it's functionally disabled.
Also, add a test to confirm the behaviour.
This should resolve#1292.
* Add docs about local provider to CONTRIBUTING
Add docs about using a local provider with Terraform to CONTRIBUTING.md.
I couldn't find any prescriptive docs for this, so let's make them. Let me know if a different method is preferred (such as `.terraformrc`), this seemed like the best way from my brief search.
Upstreamed https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-website/pull/474 as well to help improve the central Terraform docs on this subject.
* Update CONTRIBUTING.md (#2086)
I'm working on Stackdriver monitoring in another branch, which required updating `google.golang.org/genproto`, which required updating `google.golang.org/grpc`, which required updating `github.com/golang/protobuf`, and so on. This PR updates all of the Google-provided deps to their latest versions. In addition, there is:
- A change in config.go to reflect an updated type name
- Five files changed by `make fmt`
Tested with `make build`, `make test`, and `make testacc`.
I also did a bit of cleanup while I was here and noticed things that I thought could be improved in the files (wording changes, removing tests that aren't quite necessary, etc.) Take a look and make sure I didn't actually remove anything important!
So, every time this test fails we are leaving behind 10 CPUs. This is a big cause of our quota problem because we are at 70!! right now. We still need to fix the test but let's also reduce this count to 1 so we leave 1/10th of the zombie instances.
Changing from a new to legacy health check also did not work so I have no clue what the issue is here. Observing the instances, they are shown as being stuck in "Instance is being verified" state for up to days.
We had a failure in the last CI run while waiting for this resource to be created, so let's increase the timeout.
```
------- Stdout: -------
=== RUN TestAccDataSourceRegionInstanceGroup
--- FAIL: TestAccDataSourceRegionInstanceGroup (631.53s)
testing.go:518: Step 0 error: Error applying: 1 error(s) occurred:
* google_compute_region_instance_group_manager.foo: 1 error(s) occurred:
* google_compute_region_instance_group_manager.foo: timeout while waiting for state to become 'created' (last state: 'creating', timeout: 5m0s)
testing.go:579: Error destroying resource! WARNING: Dangling resources
may exist. The full state and error is shown below.
Error: Error refreshing: 1 error(s) occurred:
* google_compute_region_instance_group_manager.foo: 1 error(s) occurred:
* google_compute_region_instance_group_manager.foo: google_compute_region_instance_group_manager.foo: timeout while waiting for state to become 'created' (last state: 'creating', timeout: 5m0s)
State:
FAIL
```
The hadoop test passes for me locally but fails in CI, so this should give some extra debugging information (my user acct doesn't have permissions to read the dataproc logs from the failing test).
WIP for now because I want to make sure this method of reading the logs works.
TestAccComputeDisk_timeout is expected to fail 27.77% of the time because acctest.RandString can start with a number, making an invalid `name`. Let's fix that :)
I've seen questions about how to vendor come up from new members of our team and from the community in some OSS issues. Let's make our tribal knowledge a documented process!
